| |
Topic 34: Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
- Employees should be kept for ever... by mamsamae
Although, some people say that businesses should hire employees as long as they need them, however, I believe that the contrary is better. In other words, I think that businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. This will increase the loyalty of these employees to their employers, make the stability needed for improving the work, and this good reputation will make workers to focus on their jobs. Read more... - ... by michel
The issue of hiring people in the work place is variable and has lots of controversy.In my opinion,I see that the idea of having stuffs for the whole life is not good.This because of three reasons.They include,getting persons for the entire life leads to lack of creativity,boring life and decrease the sense of loyality. Read more... - ... by victor
Travel agency rapidly developed these years. That serves people a convenient way to travel to a lot of places. Though there are a lot of advantages of travel agency. I do not agree that this kind of travel which the travel company offers to us is always better. Read more... - Factory... by totascom
Once you hear that a cooperation wants to build a production plant near our community you would tend to think what impact this would contribute to your neighborhood. Hence, you start to point out the advantages and disadvantages of this issue. As a result, in this essay I will state what I think this project would have on our people. Read more... - business employee... by sss111
Employees of business are used to be hired for entire lives and it becomes a rule in the business. However, such action brings a lot of shortcomings and I think for a company\'s survive, it is not very good to hire employees for their entire lives. Read more... - Contractualization: A By-product of Corporate Greed.... by Christine
With the current fiscal crisis, having a job nowadays can indeed be considered a blessing. With the high unemployment rate, which of course, is directly proportional to the rising population, families who belong to the working class do struggle just to make ends meet. Read more... - ... by jeannp
in a world never ben any guaranty for everything is permanently.it is nice for life time guaranty his job.so they can feel some security about his life.no any burden or tension over his shoulder,they can relax life time or end of life.but they have no extra ambitious and sacrifice entire life,it is my personal opinion.here, most important question,it is good for every employee desire a single job for entire lives.think about this statement and it is solutation.we are consider some reason,it is righe or wrong for sinlgle employement. Read more... - ... by VimalPatel
Businesses are the growup in the world day by day.Businesses are the most ecnomy power of any country.Every business are devlop with the purpose of profit in, and make profit in business is depands on the employees working in that business.According to requirments of customers they have to change in business. so according to changes in business employess have to modify them selves or learing new thnig for continue working.So at the side of Business to make stable in market they have to change and accoring to that chanhge they have to hier new employeres in business. Read more... - No they shouldn't... by chuanyau58
According to the following reasons, the business should not hires employees for their entire lives. Read more... - SHould they?... by asdfasdf
In Japan they had a system which was called, \"work is your home, your home is your work\" This system was the most common system untill the 20th century. However, these days, they don\'t do it anymore. Why? The times had been changed the more important thing is the efficiancy. There are two reasons why I don\'t agree with the statement. First, It makes the employes too loose that they don\'t work well. Second, when the employes get old, they work very inefficient. Read more... - life time employees... by abd2006
People believe that the business field is the easiest field there is. Most of these people even think that the business field has a number of life time employees and they think it is the right way to go. Well it is obvious that these people don\'t even know the basics of the business field. They think it’s just fun and games. That it doesn’t require a college degree and it just needs money. Read more... - ... by miro111
From my observations, most households keep a pet and the majority of them do so for long periods of time. it is my firm conviction that it comes naturally for people to develop an affection for animals and therefore to consider them to be a part of the family. Read more... - Businesses should not hire employees for their entire lives... by Andrey
Some people think businesses should hire employees for their entire life. Other people think this is an old approach. In my industry people change their jobs quite often. Even though I see advantages and disadvantages in both approaches I tend to incline to the latter. Read more... - ... by saiddes
Many people may allege that salary increases and promotions are way to reward employees for good work. On the other hand, the contrary party claims that salary increases and promotions are not only ways to reward employees for good work but there are other important rewards for employees and this can be effective in encouraging further good work. Positively, I myself support the second opinion. Actually, this is due to some reasons; transportation, insurance, and friendship between employees and their directors are very important rewards for employees Read more... - Employee For Life... by ssm_as
Some people believe that businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Other people disagree with this idea for different points of view. In my opinion I believe that businesses should not hire an employees for his entire life. Of course, there are many reasons that could support my opinion. In the meanwhile, I will focus on two main reasons. Read more... - ... by dlraghehhh
business is hard to class dalia girl boy data school for play ball . swim very well in the sea. have lunch Read more... - ... by tri6phi
I disagree with this statement that Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives for several reasons. Firstly, the new technologies which entered most of businesses such that factories became not suitable for number employees. Also, if employees know that their employers should hire them for their entire lives, they will become lazy. Read more... - ... by asasasa
Undoubtedly, some people tend to agree with the statement that businesses have responsibilities to hire employees for their entire lives. However, the statement in my view has no ground in any aspect of both business\' and employees competition and I totally disagree with it but believe that businesses should hire employees only who bring benefits to them. If any employee\'s performance is bad or is not proper in his or her position, companies should lay off the employee and seek for a better person to maintain their competition. In the following, the rationale behind my standpoint is addressed. Read more... - ... by swetamht
Person work hard for job when that person get best effort of it because main aim behind working is to earn money.If he has security for own job then that person will not move to other compney or organization as he or she get better progress and salary in curent company.So if businesses take care of emplyee then definetely they will also take care of business.And because of it profit of business will incease fast.
To achive this goal employees plays vital roal and for that businesses should give appreciation to their employees.and giving financial security is the best way for that. And this is possible when any company consider their employee permenent and give the advantages and benifits of permenent employee. Read more... - business should hire employees for their entire life... by Management
In this competition world, each and every business has several number of experts and co-wrokers for their assistance. People are choosing the jobs according to the pay and allowances. As a result nobody will work under one employee. Every cycle, they changing their job into someother company. In this case, if employer will hire the employee for their entire lives that will create the problems to the enterprener. Hence i do not agree the statement that associater should hire for their entire lives. Read more... - Hiring employees for entire life... by vinita
The issue of hiring employees for a bussiness solely depends on the employer and it may vary from person to person and it also depends on the type of job required in the bussiness.But having a general view of the issue I think employees must have an upper age limit to work in a firm and they should not be hired for their entire lives because it may arise a number of problems for the firm as well as for the employee.
Read more... - Hire employees... by Strelia
Some business cultures prefer to hire workers, when they are young and employ them until they retire. I disagree with this position, because nowadays there is a great competition between companies. I think that companies should have several important requirements to employees, such as speed, constant development and an ability to gain new experience. Read more... - hiring employees for their entire lies.... by advancemed
Job security is very important for employees, especially in the USA. For this reason, if businesses hire them for their entire lives, they will be worry free about their future. On the other hand, if I were a business owner, I would not hire them for their entire lives. However, since I am not a bussiness owner, I support the idea of hiring employees for their entire lives. I would like to offer the reasons for my view in the following essay. Read more... - Businesses and Hiring Employees... by harbba0i
An employee has a productive period during his practical life. His momentum needs to be induced to keep up high productivity. For an employee, he might lose the interest as he stays in the same job for a long time. Similarly, for businesses, it is not an effective way to hold an employee that he is losing the interest by the time. Therefore, I strongly disagree with the argument to hire employees for thier entire lives. Read more... - Young and unemployed... by Davide
Nowadays, finding a job can be very hard for a young man/woman. When a person manages to find a job, it\'s difficult s/he will be employed in the same business for his/her entire life. This is not because people love changing job very frequently, but the real reason is the crisis of the job market. Read more... - Should businesses hire employes for lifetime?... by shilpa
Businesses flourish when group of certain people work together.It includes a head and his various employees. I believe that hiring people for lifetime is not a good option. If I am a head of any company I will like to have a blend of people, some with new ideas and some with lot of experience. I think this combination forms the base for success in any business.
Read more... - be descriptive... by bijalmody
I agree with this satatement that Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives.Because now a days employment is a big problem all over the world. so if the arrange ment is like that then people who once got a job don\'t need to worry through their whole life. Read more... - Advantages and disadvantages of hiring employees for their e... by Adelisha
One can name some examples of people working their whole life at one and the same place, but as a rule, businesses prefer to change their eployees. Both ways have advantages and disadvantages.
Read more... - Hiring Employee... by gokche11
In a contemporary life, the economy has been globalized and if one wants to run a business successfully, should hire employees to be more efficient. In my opinion, hiring employees means that separation of duties in the business. This separation has lots of advantages to the businesses.
Read more... - Servant or employee?!... by ANONYMOUS
Jobs often express a person’s skills, work preparation and previous study. As a result, after gaining enough experience and knowledge, every employee wants to overreach the current level by being promoted or sometimes changing the present employment. Read more... - 34... by ANONYMOUS
The question on whether a business should hire employee for their entire life time has been debated by people for years. In my opinion this expectation is totally unrealistic and actually undermines a businesses progression in making profit. Read more... - 34... by ANONYMOUS
Now days, some people hold the opinion that business should hire the employees for entire life, but others, in contrast, have negative attitude. As far as I am concerned I personally feel that it is the responsibility of every business to fulfill the needs of its employees but hiring employees for entire life seems unrealistic to me. There are numerous reasons for my stance on this topic, and I would explore only few of the most important ones here. Read more... - Employees for Life... by ANONYMOUS
Unlike in the seventies, Companies nowadays are adapting what we call bottomline thinking. They are more concerned with the company's financial position rather than their most valuable asset, which are the employees. In addition to that, companies are also adapting contractualism which is a wide spread practice in the Philippines. These philosophies give a negative feedback to the labor force for several reasons. Read more... - Business and Employees... by ANONYMOUS
There are many advantages and disadvantages to offering employees job security for life. In Japan, for example, prospective employees know that their employers will provide them with job security for their entire working days and they are better able to plan for their future and family. However, many businesses are now realizing that their employees have less motivation to work and this leads to less profit for the company. I will describe the advantages and disadvantages of this system in this essay and I will show that ultimately “jobs for life” is not good for a society. Read more... - Businesses should hire employe... by ANONYMOUS
If it is possible for us to predict which jobs and companies are fit for us, we do not need to change jobs at all in rest of our life, but, unfortunately, nothing can we do for future choice except take the risk. Personally speaking, it is unrealistic to work in the same company because every choice we make is unpredictable and we should enjoy the experience brought by the changing. Read more... - employee... by ANONYMOUS
I don’t believe the businesses should hire their employees for their entire lives. Some companies have had such policies just to prove that it is not realistic, harmful to the company and finally also harmful to the employees. Although this is surely a controversial question, especially when you take moral and social problems into account, it is not practical because some aspects of human nature are against it. Here are several reasons. Read more... - business-employees-entire life... by ANONYMOUS
In my opinion it would be senseless to hire employees for their entire lives.This would lead many problems for the owners of the business because you do not have the freedom to act in times of a crisis. Read more... - Businesses should hire employe... by ANONYMOUS
It is a little bit difficult to prefer one opinion to another, because both of them have positive sides and negatiove sides. To some extent, it is hard to distinguish, that does not mean they are of the same to me. After weighing these two features I agree with statment that businesses should hire enployees for their entire life, if personal quality is considred as a criterion to choose things Read more... - temporary or entire life?... by ANONYMOUS
Nowadays some Japanese companies quit hiring employees for their entire lives because it's outdated and not efficient. However, I don't agree the idea because employees have to worry about when they will be fired and it is very difficult to get a new job for the people aged 40 or older. Read more... - essay... by ANONYMOUS
Employees in business are very competitive, should the employer hire them for their entire lives? I disagree, because hiring employees for their entire lives would lead to the employees become lazy. Furthermore, it would reduce their willing to keep learning. Read more... - businesses should hire employe... by ANONYMOUS
Hiring emplyees for thier entire life in company or businesses has advantige and disadvantage for both sides. I prefer the hiring for whole life in a company or a business. Read more... - young employees... by ANONYMOUS
Firms’ needs vary from time to time. I think your old employee may neither keep pace with world nor be efficient as they cannot have his or her strength. And also your communication with this kind of employee is like father and son or daughter, so you could not provide discipline. For these reasons I disagree. I explain why I mention about these reason following paragraphs. Read more... - No Competence No Progress... by ANONYMOUS
Some businesses claim that once a worker is employed, he/she will be hired forever, which seems to be a kind of welfare that attracts many people. However, the question is whether this policy works well. Hardly. Read more... - hiring for their entire lives?... by ANONYMOUS
The statement above suggests that businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. As far as I am concerned, I disagree with this statenment for two main reasons. The supporting ideas are outlined as follows. Read more... - Human resources strategy... by ANONYMOUS
A business either small or large has to have a strong human resources politics. They have to decide the recruiting and the motivation of human resources and as well to plan the employee’s life in the company. The management has to consider some important elements before taking their decisions. Read more... - Human resources... by ANONYMOUS
A business either small or large has to have a strong human resources politics. They have to decide the recruiting and the motivation of human resources and as well to plan the employee’s life in the company. The management has to consider some important elements before taking their decisions. Read more... - Ghangeablility-surviving... by ANONYMOUS
The successful conduct of today’s business firms is very close to that of chameleon; they must be alert and changeable in order to survive. Therefore, the hiring of people for their entire live is more expression of respect according to merits than successful move. Despite its invaluable experience and undisputable merits, a long-serving officer finally became useless in such dynamic environment as the world of business is. Read more... - Hiring employees in a business... by ANONYMOUS
Business means maximization of profit and minimization of cost.Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. I am not agreed to this opinion.Nowadays the average lifespan of humanbeing is 70-80 years.It is the general tendency of humanbeing that the mental and physical capabilities decline when the man grows older. If the business firm is hiring people for their entire lives, there would be high chances of loss in productivity. Read more... - Business should hire employees... by ANONYMOUS
It is a debatable subject that business should hire employee for their entire lives. Most people claim that business should give money and support their employees throughout their lives, because experienced workers should be awarded. However, some people advocate that world is changing continuously, and also business needs new young and skillful people therefore, business should not hire employees for their entire life. I agree with this thought, because day by day jobs are changing and old people do not adapt this. Read more... - Permanent Employment... by ANONYMOUS
In dealing with a system of permanent employment, some people think that business should hire employees for their entire lives; however, I disagree with this opinion for the following three reasons: employees may decide to start an enterprise, they may seize an opportunity to work in anther better company, and they may switch to the different line of work. Read more... - Response to Topic 34... by ANONYMOUS
In the past, many people have worked in one business, firm or enterprise for their whole life. However, in these days the situation is changing, many employees are changing their working places more frequently. I think, it is not necessary that businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
Employees to businesses is like students to schools. A Top school is ranked by the presentation of their students or graduated students. It is the same condition as that a successful business need not only good strategy but also outstanding employees. A developing employee can benefit the company by his advices, researches, or prposals. A developed company can also benefit the workers. The training, the environment, or the experiences are the treasure to an employee in his working life. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
When we faces to the controversial topic, it seems a little bit difficult to choose approval or disapproval between them, because two sides of the opinion have their own positive sides and negative sides. To some extent, it is hard to distinguish strictly, but this does not mean they are of the same to me. After weighing their different features, I disagree the above statement that businesses should hire employees for their entire lives, if personal quality is considered as a criterion to choose things. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
When we faces to the controversial topical, it seems a little bit difficult to choose approval or disapproval between them, because these two sides of the opinion have their own positive sides and negative side. To some extent, it is hard to distinguish strictly, but this does not mean they are of the same to me. After weighing their different features, I disagree the above statement that businesses should hire employees for their entire lives, if personal quality is considered as a criterion to choose things. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
Businesses are always trying to keep their actual employees because they know that frequent employee rotation brings a large amount of problems like the loss of valuable time, possible inconsistency of actions of new employees and a considerable increase of expenses on recruiting and training. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
In the previous decades, most employees have been hired for a lifetime. People often got most of their education and training once hired in a company. Today the situation has changed. Rapid changes in market demands has caused businesses to keep up with this developement through more flexibility; included increased job rotation. This is my strongest reason for disagreeing with the proposal in this essay. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
Some people believe that if employees were hired for their entire life, it would provide businesses with excellent, experienced and highly knowledgeable specialists. However, after careful thought, I tend to disagree with this idea. I am sure this practice will have the adverse effect on the employees’ performance and career options for many people. First of all, it will eliminate the competitive element, which whips up many people to improve their professional performance. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
The whole employment system concerns many people`s interests. Public opinion regarding whether bossess should permanent jobs is divided. These bosses, certainly, ought to provide their empolyees with a stable job environment. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
During the crisis in information technology sector , we have seen that lots of people laid off by companies.We had read in newspapers that , many people who were recently working with high salaries had to work in supermarket. This may seem very tragic but , these companies were unable to continue to make large profits anymore , so that they had a risk of bankrupcy.They tried to cut-down their spendings by cutting down jobs. There are two opposite points of views of this issue. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
Should business hire employees for their entire lives? It seems, in so many items ,very difficult to prefer one to another because both the choice has item advantages and disadvantages to some extent and it is hard to distinguish. To be frank if I am the leader of a business company, I will choose not to hire employees for their entire lives and the reasons are given as follows. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
I agree with the statement television, newspapers, magazines, and other media pay too much attention to the personal lives of famous people such as public figures and celebrities. Although these people receive some interest from others, they still have their legal rights. Paying too much attention to the personal lives of prominent people makes a lot of disadvantages. For example, they will be infringed their rights, they will lose their reputations, and they will be wrong examples for other people. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
In the modern society, people are taking a fresh look at whether companies should offer employees job security for their entire lives,since many businesses are now realizing that job security make employees less motivation to work and this leads to less profit for the company.Even though job security also has its own merits,it is becoming a conspicuous obstacle to develop businesses. Consequently,after pondering this question on many occasions,I believe that offering job for entire life is not a wiser choice for the development of company and society.My arguments for this view are based on the propensity of the following points. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
I think businesses should not hire employees for their entire lives. There are several reasons for this such as the productivity of the business and opportunities for youngsters. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
Whether businesses should hire employees for their entire lives is relatively a subject of discussion as hiring employees for the lifetime increases the level of commitment and an undying loyalty and gives the feeling of security to employees whereas hiring new employees brings fresh blood in an organisation. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
Many employees change their work after they work for a company or a year or two. But is that good for the business? Whether business should hire employees for their entire lives? Some people may answer no, however others support that idea as I do. There are numerous reasons why I think business should hire employees for their entire lives and I would explore a few of the most important ones here. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
Should business hire employees for their entire lives? My answer is no. A business has the responsibility to take care of the right and interests of its employees, therefore it should keep them as long as it can. But it is not realistic that a business can hire its employees for their entire lives. Read more... - ... by ANONYMOUS
There are many advantages and disadvantages to off employees job security for life. In Japan, for example, prospective employees know that their employers will provide them with job security for their entire working days and they are better able to plan for their future and family. However, many businesses are now realizing that their employees have less motivation to work and this leads to less profits for the company. I will describe the advantages and disadvantages of this system in this essay and I will show that ultimately “jobs for life” is not good for a society. Read more...
|
|
